Annual Evaluation
|
Management Performance Evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Instructions: Definitions for performance level degreesM
|
|
5. Performance is exceptional. Meets definition as stated in #4 but has also demonstrated outstanding success in meeting a specific mission of the district. (Appraisal Factor #5 requires justification comments- see section C
|
|
4. Performance is above average, showing consistent and important contributions which exceed expectations in this position.
|
|
3. Performance shows satisfactory attainment of the principle objectives expected in this position.
|
|
2. Performance has not reached a satisfactory level and is below average because of a specific deficiency.
|
|
1. Performance show more than one deficiency which seriously interferes with the attainment of the expected objectives of the position. (Appraisal Factor #1 requires justification comments-see section C )
|
B. Performance Criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Evaluation (Circle One)
|
|
* Exceptional
|
|
* Above Average
|
|
* Satisfactory
|
|
* Less than Satisfactory
|
|
* Deficient
|
|
C. PERFORMANCE LEVELS 1 AND 5 REQUIRE JUSTISFICATION COMMENTS:
|
|
|
D. PLEASE IDENTIFY ANY UNIQUE CONDITIONS that existed which influenced the evaluation of the management employee, such as” being a new employee “or “on an unusual assignment”.
|
|
|
E. PLEASE COMMENT ON THE MANAGER’S COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT relative to district interest, if appropriate.
|
|
|
G. I have discussed this report with my supervisor and have received a copy of it. I understand that my signature does not necessarily indicate that I am in agreement with the rating but is merely acknowledgement that the discussion has taken place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
